Skip to content
Cheap colocation
Table of Contents

    Colocation is an excellent option for businesses that want to reduce IT infrastructure costs and improve reliability. Not all colocation options are priced the same, however. While several factors drive pricing, including the cost of power, real estate, and demand in the market, there are several tips that businesses can use to find cheap colocation options.

    Affordable capacity is harder to secure in 2026. Primary-market vacancy fell to 1.4% in the first half of the year, while asking rates rose across every capacity tier. This guide explains how to reduce colocation costs without compromising power, connectivity, security, or uptime.

    Let’s get started!

    What Drives Colocation Pricing?

    Before comparing facilities, understand the variables behind colocation pricing. Power, real estate, available capacity, network connectivity, deployment size, redundancy, and contract terms all influence the final quote.

    The Cost of Power

    Power is usually one of the largest components of a colocation bill. Quotes reflect reserved capacity, actual energy use, cooling, redundancy, utility tariffs, and any power-cost pass-through clauses.

    Electricity costs vary substantially by state. Through June 2026, the average U.S. price was 8.89 cents per kWh for industrial customers and 13.86 cents for commercial customers. Statewide industrial averages ranged from 5.41 cents in New Mexico and 6.65 cents in Texas to 19.88 cents in California and 19.94 cents in Massachusetts. Data center tariffs can differ from these statewide averages, but the figures show why location matters.

    Lower-cost power can improve the economics of markets such as Dallas, Atlanta, Nashville, Portland, and Salt Lake City. Higher energy and land costs generally make Los Angeles, New York, Boston, and Silicon Valley more expensive, although available capacity and provider competition can outweigh statewide averages.

    The Price of Real Estate

    The cost of real estate also impacts the cost of colocation. Data centers in areas with high real estate and development costs generally charge more than those in less expensive areas.

    Atlanta, Columbus, Denver, and Salt Lake City are all cities with affordable, abundant land. Silicon Valley, Los Angeles, New York City, and Boston are at the other end of the spectrum, with high property costs and limited land for development.

    Market Supply and Demand

    As with any market, the law of supply and demand also applies to a colocation facility. The cost will be higher if there is a high demand for colocation space or low inventory.

    Supply remains tight across major markets. Primary-market inventory reached 10,903 MW in the first half of 2026, yet vacancy fell to 1.4%. Of the 7,481.1 MW under construction, 80.4% was already preleased, leaving less capacity available for new customers. (CBRE)

    Pricing now rises with both scarcity and deployment size. During the same period, asking rates increased 4.3% for 250–500 kW requirements, 7.9% for 500 kW–3 MW, 8.3% for 3–10 MW, and 6.7% for requirements above 10 MW.

    How Can You Find Affordable Colocation?

    The lowest quote is not always the lowest total cost. Use the following steps to compare affordable options on equal terms.

    Be Flexible on Location

    As we’ve seen, many fixed costs are included in the price of colocation that are outside the provider’s control. When you can be flexible on the location of your data center, you will get a much better deal.

    If you are in San Diego or Los Angeles, consider a Salt Lake City or Phoenix data center. If you are in Chicago, consider Columbus, OH. In addition to cost, you will also gain some disaster recovery benefits by locating your data center away from your corporate office.

    Compare Prices

    Request at least three bids using the same technical requirements. Compare monthly recurring charges, installation fees, committed power, metered energy, bandwidth, cross-connects, remote hands, annual escalators, and contract length. Brightlio can gather and normalize these quotes for a true like-for-like comparison.

    Evaluate service quality and risk alongside price. Review uptime commitments, redundancy design, security controls, compliance scope, carrier choice, support response times, and the provider’s maintenance history before selecting a facility.

    Negotiate with Providers

    Another effective way to reduce colocation costs is to negotiate with providers. Providers may offer discounts or other incentives to win your business, especially if you are a new customer.

    Longer terms can reduce the starting rate, while a phased power commitment can prevent you from paying for unused capacity on day one. Bundling bandwidth, cloud, backup and disaster recovery, dedicated servers, managed services, or remote hands may create additional leverage.

    Negotiate the full commercial package, not just the base monthly rate. Ask for caps on annual increases, waived installation charges, cross-connect credits, clear energy-adjustment formulas, expansion rights, and realistic service-level remedies.

    Consider Partial Rack Colocation Options

    One of the most effective ways to reduce colocation costs is to consider partial rack colocation options. Partial rack colocation options include 1U, 2U, quarter, and half rack options. These options allow businesses to rent a smaller amount of space in a data center, which can significantly reduce the cost of colocation. For instance, a small business that only needs to host one or two servers can rent only the space they need rather than a full cabinet.

    Shared-rack space can limit expansion and may provide less physical separation than a private cabinet. Confirm locking partitions, access controls, audit requirements, and a migration path before choosing a fractional-rack service.

    11 Cities That Can Offer Affordable Colocation

    No city is always the cheapest because availability, deployment size, redundancy, and provider competition affect every quote. These eleven markets often deserve consideration when cost is a priority. The electricity figures below use June 2026 year-to-date state industrial averages and are directional rather than facility-specific tariffs. (EIA)

    Atlanta

    Atlanta combines extensive fiber connectivity with a 7.62-cent statewide industrial electricity price. Its pipeline reached 2,882 MW in the first half of 2026, but asking rates for requirements above 10 MW rose 14.5% as demand absorbed capacity. Atlanta can still deliver value, but customers should compare available inventory rather than assume every facility is inexpensive. (CBRE)

    Atlanta Data Centers

    Chicago

    Chicago remains a strong central option for businesses serving both U.S. coasts and Canada. Illinois recorded a 9.96-cent industrial electricity price through June 2026, although asking rates for requirements above 10 MW increased 9.7% as availability tightened. Compare suburban campuses with downtown carrier-rich facilities because their economics and connectivity differ. (CBRE)

    Dallas

    Dallas offers a large provider ecosystem, central geography, and access to major fiber networks. Texas recorded a 6.65-cent industrial electricity price through June 2026, one of the lowest among major data center states. The main constraint is often the date utility power can be delivered, so confirm energization schedules before comparing price.

    Indianapolis 

    Indianapolis can provide lower land costs and less competition for capacity than the largest primary markets. Indiana’s industrial electricity price averaged 9.15 cents per kWh through June 2026. Its central location makes the market worth comparing for Midwest production and disaster-recovery deployments.

    Kansas City

    Kansas City is a practical secondary market for organizations that do not need a coastal hub. Missouri’s industrial electricity price averaged 8.39 cents per kWh through June 2026, while the city’s central geography supports regional latency and disaster-recovery strategies.

    Las Vegas

    Las Vegas can be a cost-effective western alternative to Los Angeles and Silicon Valley. Nevada’s industrial electricity price averaged 8.09 cents per kWh through June 2026, and the market provides useful connectivity to major western metros. Confirm carrier diversity and expansion capacity for each facility.

    Las Vegas Data Center

    Phoenix

    Phoenix offers a broad colocation market, available land, and strong east-west fiber connectivity. Arizona’s industrial electricity price averaged 7.34 cents per kWh through June 2026. Customers should evaluate water strategy, utility delivery dates, heat-related cooling design, and sustainability commitments alongside the quoted rate.

    Portland

    Portland and Hillsboro appeal to organizations that prioritize sustainability, temperate weather, and Pacific connectivity. Oregon’s industrial electricity price averaged 8.24 cents per kWh through June 2026. Large-deployment asking rates were flat year over year, but limited transaction activity means customers should verify actual availability. (CBRE)

    Nashville

    Nashville can offer lower land costs than primary markets and a useful location for Southeastern deployments. Tennessee’s industrial electricity price averaged 6.77 cents per kWh through June 2026. Because the provider ecosystem is smaller than Atlanta or Dallas, confirm carrier choice, remote-hands coverage, and expansion options.

    Nashville Data Center

    Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh offers a secondary-market alternative for Northeast and Midwest workloads. Pennsylvania’s industrial electricity price averaged 10.91 cents per kWh through June 2026. Lower real-estate costs can improve total value, but buyers should compare network ecosystems and available inventory with larger nearby markets.

    Salt Lake City

    Salt Lake City combines western fiber routes, developable land, and an 8.49-cent industrial electricity price through June 2026. It can provide better value than coastal California, but buyers should verify carrier diversity, power delivery, and seismic design at the facility level.

    Conclusion

    Affordable colocation remains available despite low vacancy and rising asking rates. Flexibility on location, standardized quote comparisons, negotiated contract terms, phased power commitments, and smaller footprints can all reduce total cost.

    The cheapest option is not automatically the best value. Select a provider that meets your uptime, security, connectivity, support, compliance, and expansion requirements at a sustainable total cost.

    Brightlio Delivers Affordable Colocation Solutions

    At Brightlio, we understand that finding the right colocation solution for your company can be time-consuming. That’s why we support our clients in navigating the colocation market and finding affordable, secure options that meet their needs. As a telecom broker, we work with a global network of trusted providers to offer a wide range of choices at competitive pricing.

    Whether you need a partial colocation rack, full rack, private cage, or suite, Brightlio can help you find a service that fits your budget. Additionally, we offer network connectivity, cloud, unified communications, dedicated servers, and advisory services, delivering holistic solutions for your technology needs. We are happy to answer any questions you may have.

    Get started with Brightlio today!

    Let's start

    a new project together